QOWZ vs SCHD
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QOWZ | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $10M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +4.90% | +27.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.11% | +31.26% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | Oct 20, 2011 |
QOWZ vs SCHD Performance
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QOWZ returned +4.11% while SCHD returned +31.26%. Year to date, QOWZ is up 4.90% versus a gain of 27.67% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QOWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for QOWZ and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QOWZ charges 0.39% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $6 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QOWZ currently yields 0.25% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
QOWZ and SCHD share 1 holdings out of 149 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QOWZ | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADP | 2.68% | 2.72% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QOWZ or SCHD?
QOWZ has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QOWZ or SCHD?
Over the past year QOWZ returned +4.11% vs +31.26% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QOWZ annualized +18.45% vs +11.57% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QOWZ or SCHD?
QOWZ has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: QOWZ -20.4% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both QOWZ and SCHD?
QOWZ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QOWZ and SCHD?
QOWZ and SCHD share 1 common holdings with a 2.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 149 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QOWZ or SCHD?
QOWZ yields 0.25% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.