QOWZ vs VXUS
QOWZ vs VXUS
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QOWZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $12M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +5.26% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.72% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QOWZ vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QOWZ returned +4.72% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, QOWZ is up 5.26% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.8% for QOWZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for QOWZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QOWZ charges 0.39% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $5 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QOWZ currently yields 0.26% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QOWZ and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7911 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QOWZ or VXUS?
QOWZ has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QOWZ or VXUS?
Over the past year QOWZ returned +4.72% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QOWZ annualized +18.87% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QOWZ or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.8% for QOWZ. Worst drawdown: QOWZ -20.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QOWZ and VXUS?
QOWZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QOWZ and VXUS?
QOWZ and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7911 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QOWZ or VXUS?
QOWZ yields 0.26% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.