QOWZ vs VTI
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QOWZ or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QOWZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.06% | +11.53%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.20% | +15.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.67% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.59% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $15,439 | $17,180Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2023 to Sep 15, 2026 (2.8 years).
QOWZ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
QOWZ vs VTI Performance
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QOWZ returned -1.20% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, QOWZ is up 2.06% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QOWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 12.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for QOWZ and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QOWZ charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QOWZ currently yields 0.25% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of QOWZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 12.0% of VTI's money is in holdings QOWZ also owns.
Most of QOWZ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
50 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in QOWZ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 52 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,103 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QOWZ (85.5% of the fund), and 1 for QOWZ that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QOWZ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.54% | 6.40% | 3.14% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.60% | 2.56% | 3.04% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 4.72% | 0.63% | 4.09% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 3.77% | 0.20% | 3.57% |
| KLACKla Corp | 3.01% | 0.33% | 2.68% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc | 3.12% | 0.16% | 2.96% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 2.99% | 0.14% | 2.85% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2.98% | 0.15% | 2.83% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 2.76% | 0.14% | 2.62% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 2.52% | 0.12% | 2.40% |
100.0% of QOWZ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QOWZ or VTI?
QOWZ has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QOWZ or VTI?
Over the past year QOWZ returned -1.20% vs +15.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QOWZ or VTI?
QOWZ has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 12.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QOWZ -20.4% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both QOWZ and VTI?
QOWZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QOWZ and VTI?
100.0% of QOWZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 12.0% of VTI's is in holdings QOWZ also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in QOWZ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QOWZ or VTI?
QOWZ yields 0.25% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QOWZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.