QOWZ vs VTI
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QOWZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $10M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.14% | +12.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.01% | +20.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
QOWZ vs VTI Performance
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QOWZ returned +4.01% while VTI returned +20.47%. Year to date, QOWZ is up 5.14% versus a gain of 12.79% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.8% for QOWZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.4% for QOWZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QOWZ charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QOWZ currently yields 0.25% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QOWZ and VTI share 42 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QOWZ or VTI?
QOWZ has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QOWZ or VTI?
Over the past year QOWZ returned +4.01% vs +20.47% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QOWZ annualized +18.47% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QOWZ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.8% for QOWZ. Worst drawdown: QOWZ -20.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QOWZ and VTI?
QOWZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QOWZ and VTI?
QOWZ and VTI share 42 common holdings with a 11.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QOWZ or VTI?
QOWZ yields 0.25% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.