QPX vs VTI
Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QPX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QPX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $33M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.78% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.34% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.45% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.98% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 28, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
QPX vs VTI Performance
Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QPX returned +23.34% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, QPX is up 9.78% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, QPX compounded at +20.45% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.98% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QPX has the edge at +12.72% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QPX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.7% for QPX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QPX charges 1.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $174 vs $3 annually, a gap of $171 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QPX currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QPX and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QPX or VTI?
QPX has an expense ratio of 1.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $171 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QPX or VTI?
Over the past year QPX returned +23.34% vs +22.35% for VTI, so QPX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QPX annualized +12.72% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QPX or VTI?
QPX has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QPX -34.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QPX and VTI?
QPX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QPX and VTI?
QPX and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QPX or VTI?
QPX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.