QPX vs VOO
Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QPX | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $32M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.38% | +13.81% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.76% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.34% | +21.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.45% | +12.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 28, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QPX vs VOO Performance
Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QPX returned +20.76% while VOO returned +21.53%. Year to date, QPX is up 9.38% versus a gain of 13.81% for VOO.
Over three years, QPX compounded at +19.34% per year against +21.46% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.45% and +12.87% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +12.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QPX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.7% for QPX and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QPX charges 1.74% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $174 vs $3 annually, a gap of $171 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QPX currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QPX and VOO share 0 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QPX or VOO?
QPX has an expense ratio of 1.74% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $171 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QPX or VOO?
Over the past year QPX returned +20.76% vs +21.53% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QPX annualized +12.56% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QPX or VOO?
QPX has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QPX -34.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QPX and VOO?
QPX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QPX and VOO?
QPX and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QPX or VOO?
QPX yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.