QPX vs VXUS
Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QPX | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.74% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $31M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +10.80% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.96% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.06% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.55% | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 28, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QPX vs VXUS Performance
Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QPX returned +23.96% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, QPX is up 10.80% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, QPX compounded at +20.06% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +11.55% and +9.14% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QPX has the edge at +12.98% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QPX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.7% for QPX and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QPX charges 1.74% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $174 vs $5 annually, a gap of $169 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QPX currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QPX and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7867 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QPX or VXUS?
QPX has an expense ratio of 1.74% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $169 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QPX or VXUS?
Over the past year QPX returned +23.96% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QPX annualized +12.98% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QPX or VXUS?
QPX has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QPX -34.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QPX and VXUS?
QPX and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QPX and VXUS?
QPX and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7867 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QPX or VXUS?
QPX yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.