QPX vs VYM
Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QPX | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.74% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $31M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +11.55% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.67% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.20% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.56% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 28, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QPX vs VYM Performance
Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QPX returned +22.67% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, QPX is up 11.55% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, QPX compounded at +20.20% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.56% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QPX has the edge at +13.09% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QPX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.7% for QPX and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QPX charges 1.74% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $174 vs $4 annually, a gap of $170 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QPX currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QPX and VYM share 0 holdings out of 564 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QPX or VYM?
QPX has an expense ratio of 1.74% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $170 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QPX or VYM?
Over the past year QPX returned +22.67% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), QPX annualized +13.09% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QPX or VYM?
QPX has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QPX -34.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QPX and VYM?
QPX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QPX and VYM?
QPX and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 564 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QPX or VYM?
QPX yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.