QQQ vs RA
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. RA offers more diversification with 265 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 2.36% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $772M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 10.02% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 645 | |
| YTD Return | +19.68% | +5.05% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.75% | +6.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.25% | +1.48% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.39% | +0.29% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 18.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -54.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 2, 2016 |
QQQ vs RA Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) is a ETF from Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc.. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% while RA returned +6.95%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.68% versus a gain of 5.05% for RA.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.25% per year against +1.48% for RA; over five years the annualized figures are +15.39% and +0.29% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.0% for RA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -54.9% for RA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RA charges 2.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $236 annually, a gap of $218 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 10.02% for RA.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RA share 4 holdings out of 364 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RA?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RA charges 2.36%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $218 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RA?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% vs +6.95% for RA, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QQQ annualized +13.15% vs +0.74% for RA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RA?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.0% for RA. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RA -54.9%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RA?
QQQ and RA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RA?
QQQ and RA share 4 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 364 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RA?
QQQ yields 0.41% while RA yields 10.02%, so RA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.