QQQ vs RA
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.
Which is better, QQQ or RA?
Large Cap Growth against Debt-oriented balanced.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 2.36% |
| AUM | $486.1B | $769M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 10.16% |
| Holdings | 107 | 598 |
| YTD Return | +17.54%Best | +4.02% |
| 1Y Return | +25.59%Best | +3.40% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.63%Best | +10.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.18%Best | -0.06% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 17.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -54.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,407Best | $9,970 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Debt-oriented balanced |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 2, 2016 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2016 to Sep 4, 2026 (9.7 years).
QQQ vs RA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs RA Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) is an ETF from Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc.. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.59% while RA returned +3.40%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.54% versus a gain of 4.02% for RA.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +24.63% per year against +10.66% for RA; over five years the annualized figures are +14.18% and -0.06% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.92% annualized vs +0.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 17.9% for RA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -54.9% for RA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RA charges 2.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $236 annually, a gap of $218 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 10.16% for RA.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings RA also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RA, our book for it covers 79.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and RA share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 127 days apart, QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026 and RA as of Mar 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 266 in RA, against full books of 107 and 598.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and RA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RA?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RA charges 2.36%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $218 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RA?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.59% vs +3.40% for RA, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QQQ annualized +20.92% vs +0.63% for RA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RA?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 17.9% for RA. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs RA -54.9%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RA?
QQQ and RA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RA?
At least 1.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings RA also owns. Our book for RA is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 266 in RA.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RA?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RA yields 10.16%, so RA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RA better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.