IVV vs RA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.
Which is better, IVV or RA?
Large Cap Blend against Debt-oriented balanced.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 2.36% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $766M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 10.19% |
| Holdings | 508 | 598 |
| YTD Return | +14.15%Best | +0.32% |
| 1Y Return | +17.31%Best | -0.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17%Best | +10.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85%Best | -0.40% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 18.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -54.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,128Best | $9,802 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Debt-oriented balanced |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 2, 2016 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2016 to Sep 21, 2026 (9.8 years).
IVV vs RA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) is an ETF from Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc.. Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% while RA returned -0.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.15% versus a gain of 0.32% for RA.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.17% per year against +10.82% for RA; over five years the annualized figures are +13.85% and -0.40% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.56% annualized vs +0.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -54.9% for RA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RA charges 2.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $236 annually, a gap of $233 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 10.19% for RA.
Holdings Overlap
At least 3.1% of IVV's money is in holdings RA also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RA, our book for it covers 79.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and RA share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 153 days apart, IVV as of Aug 31, 2026 and RA as of Mar 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
32 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 266 in RA, against full books of 508 and 598.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 0.26% | 0.47% | 0.21% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.14% | 0.44% | 0.30% |
| NRGNrg Energy | 0.04% | 0.54% | 0.50% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 0.27% | 0.28% | 0.01% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 0.10% | 0.34% | 0.24% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.36% | 0.02% | 0.34% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.07% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.16% | 0.14% | 0.02% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 0.08% | 0.21% | 0.13% |
| PCGPg&E Corp. | 0.04% | 0.22% | 0.18% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RA charges 2.36%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $233 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RA?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% vs -0.34% for RA, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +14.56% vs +0.26% for RA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RA?
RA has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs RA -54.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and RA?
IVV and RA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RA?
At least 3.1% of IVV's money is in holdings RA also owns. Our book for RA is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 266 in RA.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RA?
IVV yields 1.06% while RA yields 10.19%, so RA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RA better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.