IVV vs RA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 2.36% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $772M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 10.02% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 645 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +5.21% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +7.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +1.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +0.29% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -54.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 2, 2016 |
IVV vs RA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) is a ETF from Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund, Inc.. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while RA returned +7.69%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 5.21% for RA.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +1.53% for RA; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +0.29% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +0.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -54.9% for RA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RA charges 2.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $236 annually, a gap of $233 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 10.02% for RA.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RA share 32 holdings out of 738 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RA charges 2.36%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $233 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RA?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +7.69% for RA, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +0.76% for RA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RA?
RA has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RA -54.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and RA?
IVV and RA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RA?
IVV and RA share 32 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 738 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RA?
IVV yields 1.09% while RA yields 10.02%, so RA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.