QQQ vs REMG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. REMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. REMG offers more diversification with 383 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | REMG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.64% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $122M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.20% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 383 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +21.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +39.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 20.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -14.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Russell Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 29, 2025 |
QQQ vs REMG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) is a ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while REMG returned +39.85%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 21.52% for REMG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.5% for REMG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -14.1% for REMG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while REMG charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $64 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.20% for REMG.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and REMG share 4 holdings out of 475 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or REMG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while REMG charges 0.64%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or REMG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +39.85% for REMG, so REMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +42.55% for REMG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or REMG?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.5% for REMG. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs REMG -14.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and REMG?
QQQ and REMG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and REMG?
QQQ and REMG share 4 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 475 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or REMG?
QQQ yields 0.44% while REMG yields 1.20%, so REMG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.