IVV vs REMG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. REMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | REMG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.64% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $113M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.11% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 383 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +20.17% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +37.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 20.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -14.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Russell Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 29, 2025 |
IVV vs REMG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) is a ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while REMG returned +37.73%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 20.17% for REMG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -14.1% for REMG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while REMG charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $64 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.11% for REMG.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or REMG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while REMG charges 0.64%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or REMG?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +37.73% for REMG, so REMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +42.26% for REMG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or REMG?
REMG has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs REMG -14.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and REMG?
IVV and REMG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and REMG?
IVV and REMG share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 842 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or REMG?
IVV yields 1.09% while REMG yields 1.11%, so REMG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.