QQQ vs RINT
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. RINT offers more diversification with 326 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RINT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $147M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 0.82% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 353 | |
| YTD Return | +18.20% | +12.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.63% | +24.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.54% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.12% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 12.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -11.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Russell Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 13, 2025 |
QQQ vs RINT Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is a ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.63% while RINT returned +24.23%. Year to date, QQQ is up 18.20% versus a gain of 12.75% for RINT.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.1% for RINT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -11.9% for RINT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RINT charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $49 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 0.82% for RINT.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RINT share 4 holdings out of 425 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RINT?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RINT charges 0.49%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RINT?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.63% vs +24.23% for RINT, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +13.11% vs +25.78% for RINT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RINT?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.1% for RINT. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RINT -11.9%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RINT?
QQQ and RINT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RINT?
QQQ and RINT share 4 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 425 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RINT?
QQQ yields 0.41% while RINT yields 0.82%, so RINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.