RINT vs VYM

RINT vs VYM
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. RINT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: RINTMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRINTVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.49%0.04%
AUM$158M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.80%2.24%
Holdings353616
YTD Return+12.64%+14.95%
1Y Return+22.40%+21.14%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.69%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.00%
Volatility (annualized)12.1%14.6%
Max Drawdown-11.9%-58.8%
Fund FamilyRussell InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 13, 2025Nov 10, 2006

RINT vs VYM Performance

Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is a ETF from Russell Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RINT returned +22.40% while VYM returned +21.14%. Year to date, RINT is up 12.64% versus a gain of 14.95% for VYM.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.1% for RINT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.9% for RINT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RINT charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RINT currently yields 0.80% against 2.24% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

0.1%overlap

RINT and VYM share 2 holdings out of 938 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RINTWeight in VYMDifference
MDT0.09%0.42%0.33%
KR0.00%0.13%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RINT or VYM?

RINT has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RINT or VYM?

Over the past year RINT returned +22.40% vs +21.14% for VYM, so RINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RINT annualized +24.46% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RINT or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.1% for RINT. Worst drawdown: RINT -11.9% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both RINT and VYM?

RINT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RINT and VYM?

RINT and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 938 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RINT or VYM?

RINT yields 0.80% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free