QQQ vs ROSC
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ROSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. ROSC offers more diversification with 309 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | ROSC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.34% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $62M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.80% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 309 | |
| YTD Return | +17.07% | +20.05% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.39% | +30.04% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.08% | +16.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.18% | +10.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 18.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -46.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 23, 2015 |
QQQ vs ROSC Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.39% while ROSC returned +30.04%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.07% versus a gain of 20.05% for ROSC.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.08% per year against +16.80% for ROSC; over five years the annualized figures are +15.18% and +10.16% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.1% for ROSC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -46.3% for ROSC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ROSC charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $34 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.80% for ROSC.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and ROSC share 0 holdings out of 404 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or ROSC?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ROSC charges 0.34%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or ROSC?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.39% vs +30.04% for ROSC, so ROSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), QQQ annualized +13.05% vs +8.21% for ROSC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or ROSC?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.1% for ROSC. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs ROSC -46.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and ROSC?
QQQ and ROSC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and ROSC?
QQQ and ROSC share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 404 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ROSC?
QQQ yields 0.44% while ROSC yields 1.80%, so ROSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.