QQQ vs RSMC
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Rockefeller US Small-Mid Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RSMC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $758M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +18.31% | +15.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.37% | +12.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.79% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.20% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 15.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -22.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Rockefeller Capital Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 10, 2024 |
QQQ vs RSMC Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Rockefeller US Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) is a ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.37% while RSMC returned +12.78%. Year to date, QQQ is up 18.31% versus a gain of 15.23% for RSMC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.9% for RSMC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -22.3% for RSMC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RSMC charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 0.00% for RSMC.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RSMC share 0 holdings out of 149 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSMC?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RSMC charges 0.75%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RSMC?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.37% vs +12.78% for RSMC, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +13.10% vs +8.36% for RSMC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RSMC?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.9% for RSMC. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RSMC -22.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RSMC?
QQQ and RSMC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RSMC?
QQQ and RSMC share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 149 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RSMC?
QQQ yields 0.41% while RSMC yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.