QQQ vs RSPN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RSPN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.40% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $1.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.83% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 83 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +10.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +15.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +17.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +11.74% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 19.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -61.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 1, 2006 |
QQQ vs RSPN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while RSPN returned +15.21%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 10.75% for RSPN.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +17.66% for RSPN; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +11.74% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.4% for RSPN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -61.6% for RSPN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RSPN charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $40 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.83% for RSPN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RSPN share 11 holdings out of 172 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSPN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RSPN charges 0.40%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RSPN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +15.21% for RSPN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +10.07% for RSPN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RSPN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.4% for RSPN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RSPN -61.6%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RSPN?
QQQ and RSPN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RSPN?
QQQ and RSPN share 11 common holdings with a 3.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 172 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RSPN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RSPN yields 0.83%, so RSPN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.