QQQ vs RSPR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RSPR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.40% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $100M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.63% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 33 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | +11.41% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +6.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | +7.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | +0.62% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 18.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -43.2% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 12, 2015 |
QQQ vs RSPR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while RSPR returned +6.83%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a gain of 11.41% for RSPR.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.75% per year against +7.60% for RSPR; over five years the annualized figures are +14.78% and +0.62% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.1% for RSPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -43.2% for RSPR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RSPR charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $40 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.63% for RSPR.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RSPR share 0 holdings out of 133 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSPR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RSPR charges 0.40%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RSPR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +6.83% for RSPR, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs +4.16% for RSPR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RSPR?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.1% for RSPR. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RSPR -43.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RSPR?
QQQ and RSPR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RSPR?
QQQ and RSPR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 133 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RSPR?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RSPR yields 1.63%, so RSPR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.