QQQ vs RWIN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RWIN?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. RWIN is less concentrated, with 20.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.42% |
| AUM | $498.6B | $20M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.96% |
| Holdings | 321 | 333 |
| YTD Return | +22.09%Best | +3.69% |
| 1Y Return | +24.51% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.61% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.57% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.2% | 20.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Rayliant Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 8, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs RWIN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs RWIN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) is an ETF from Rayliant Asset Management. Year to date, QQQ is up 22.09% versus a gain of 3.69% for RWIN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RWIN charges 0.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $42 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.96% for RWIN.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings RWIN also owns. 2.2% of RWIN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
RWIN and QQQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 166 in RWIN, against full books of 321 and 333.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for RWIN that do not appear in our book for QQQ (1.7% of the fund), and 96 for QQQ that do not appear in RWIN (97.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RWIN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 0.69% | 2.23% | 1.54% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and RWIN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RWIN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RWIN charges 0.42%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RWIN?
2.2% of RWIN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.2% of RWIN's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 166 in RWIN.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RWIN?
QQQ yields 0.42% while RWIN yields 0.96%, so RWIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWIN better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. RWIN is less concentrated, with 20.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.