RWIN vs VXUS
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, RWIN or VXUS?
VXUS costs less.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWIN | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $21M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 166 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +6.04% | +12.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.86% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.33% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.46% |
| Fund Family | Rayliant Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 8, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
RWIN vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RWIN vs VXUS Performance
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) is an ETF from Rayliant Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RWIN is up 6.04% versus a gain of 12.82% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWIN charges 0.42% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $5 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWIN currently yields 0.96% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 68.3% of RWIN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
111 positions in common, counted across the 166 positions we hold weights for in RWIN and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 166 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RWIN | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 2.18% | 1.42% | 0.76% |
| ROP:SMRoche Ps Par Ag | 2.67% | 0.69% | 1.98% |
| 6857:JPAdvantest Corp|366 | 2.72% | 0.32% | 2.40% |
| SU:CASuncor Energy Inc | 2.17% | 0.18% | 1.99% |
| 8750:JPDaiichi Life Group Inc | 1.68% | 0.09% | 1.59% |
| DANSKE:CODanske Bank A.s. | 1.55% | 0.08% | 1.47% |
| REP:MARepsol S.a | 1.54% | 0.07% | 1.47% |
| POW:CAPower Corp Of Canada Common Stock | 1.52% | 0.08% | 1.44% |
| GALD:SMGalderma | 1.43% | 0.09% | 1.34% |
| SAF:PASafran Sa Common Stock Eur.2 | 1.11% | 0.30% | 0.81% |
68.3% of RWIN is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWIN or VXUS?
RWIN has an expense ratio of 0.42% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RWIN and VXUS?
At least 68.3% of RWIN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 111 positions in common, counted across the 166 positions we hold weights for in RWIN and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWIN or VXUS?
RWIN yields 0.96% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than RWIN?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.