QQQ vs SBIO
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SBIO?
Large Cap Growth against Small Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 5Y and the full window, SBIO over 1Y and 3Y. SBIO is less concentrated, with 32.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SBIO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $240M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 107 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +16.87% | +26.18%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.98% | +71.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.98% | +29.88%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.39%Best | +7.29% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7%Best | 29.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -63.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,586Best | $14,217 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 32.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 30, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 31, 2014 to Sep 11, 2026 (11.7 years).
QQQ vs SBIO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.7 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SBIO Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.98% while SBIO returned +71.94%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.87% versus a gain of 26.18% for SBIO.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +24.98% per year against +29.88% for SBIO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.39% and +7.29% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.32% annualized vs +9.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBIO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.5% compared with 18.7% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -63.1% for SBIO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SBIO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $50 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for SBIO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 104 in SBIO, totalling 99.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 104 in SBIO, against full books of 107 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for SBIO that do not appear in our book for QQQ (92.1% of the fund), and 95 for QQQ that do not appear in SBIO (97.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SBIO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SBIO?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SBIO charges 0.50%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SBIO?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.98% vs +71.94% for SBIO, so SBIO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +18.32% vs +9.09% for SBIO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SBIO?
SBIO has been the more volatile fund at 29.5% annualized versus 18.7% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs SBIO -63.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SBIO?
QQQ and SBIO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SBIO?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SBIO yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SBIO better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 5Y and the full window, SBIO over 1Y and 3Y. SBIO is less concentrated, with 32.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.