QQQ vs SKOR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
Quick Verdict
SKOR has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. SKOR offers more diversification with 1,651 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SKOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $738M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 4.71% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 1,651 | |
| YTD Return | +19.52% | +0.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.68% | +2.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.64% | +6.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.36% | +1.62% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 4.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -16.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Flexshares Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 12, 2014 |
QQQ vs SKOR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.68% while SKOR returned +2.83%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.52% versus a gain of 0.40% for SKOR.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.64% per year against +6.03% for SKOR; over five years the annualized figures are +15.36% and +1.62% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +1.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 4.5% for SKOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -16.0% for SKOR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SKOR charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $15 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 4.71% for SKOR.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SKOR share 1 holdings out of 1613 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in SKOR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 0.18% | 0.06% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SKOR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SKOR charges 0.15%. SKOR is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SKOR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.68% vs +2.83% for SKOR, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +13.14% vs +1.46% for SKOR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SKOR?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 4.5% for SKOR. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SKOR -16.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SKOR?
QQQ and SKOR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SKOR?
QQQ and SKOR share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1613 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SKOR?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SKOR yields 4.71%, so SKOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.