SKOR vs VYM
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SKOR offers more diversification with 1608 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SKOR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $729M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.66% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 1,661 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -0.06% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.46% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.81% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.59% | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Flexshares Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2014 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SKOR vs VYM Performance
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SKOR returned +2.46% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, SKOR is down 0.06% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Over three years, SKOR compounded at +5.81% per year against +18.54% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +1.59% and +12.25% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs +1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 4.5% for SKOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for SKOR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SKOR charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SKOR currently yields 4.66% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SKOR and VYM share 4 holdings out of 2162 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SKOR or VYM?
SKOR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SKOR or VYM?
Over the past year SKOR returned +2.46% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), SKOR annualized +1.42% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SKOR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 4.5% for SKOR. Worst drawdown: SKOR -16.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SKOR and VYM?
SKOR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SKOR and VYM?
SKOR and VYM share 4 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2162 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SKOR or VYM?
SKOR yields 4.66% while VYM yields 2.86%, so SKOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.