QQQ vs SMNG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs xETFs Samsung Group ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SMNG?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SMNG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $476.0B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 312 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +11.27%Best | -6.18% |
| 1Y Return | +12.28% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.18% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5%Best | 77.6% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WallStreetX ETFs, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 22, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs SMNG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs SMNG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and xETFs Samsung Group ETF (SMNG) is an ETF from WallStreetX ETFs, Inc.. Year to date, QQQ is up 11.27% versus a loss of 6.18% for SMNG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SMNG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $49 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.43% against 0.00% for SMNG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 16 in SMNG, totalling 99.7% and 96.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 16 in SMNG, against full books of 312 and 18.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for SMNG that do not appear in our book for QQQ (0.0% of the fund), and 94 for QQQ that do not appear in SMNG (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SMNG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SMNG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SMNG charges 0.49%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SMNG?
QQQ yields 0.43% while SMNG yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMNG better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.