SMNG vs VXUS
xETFs Samsung Group ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, SMNG or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMNG | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.38% |
| Holdings | 18 | 9,293 |
| YTD Return | -6.18% | +8.76%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.05% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.91% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.89% |
| Fund Family | WallStreetX ETFs, Inc. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 22, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
SMNG vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SMNG vs VXUS Performance
xETFs Samsung Group ETF (SMNG) is an ETF from WallStreetX ETFs, Inc. and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SMNG is down 6.18% versus a gain of 8.76% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMNG charges 0.49% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $5 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMNG currently yields 0.00% against 2.38% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 81.8% of SMNG's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 89.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of SMNG is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
12 positions in common, counted across the 16 positions we hold weights for in SMNG and 8,462 in VXUS, against full books of 18 and 9,293.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SMNG | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005930:KRSamsung Electronics Ltd. | 18.91% | 2.02% | 16.89% |
| 009150:KRSamsung Electro-Mechanics-PF | 18.62% | 0.14% | 18.48% |
| 006400:KRSamsung Sdi Co Ltd | 7.86% | 0.05% | 7.81% |
| 000810:KRSamsung Fire & Marine Insurance Co Ltd | 4.87% | 0.03% | 4.84% |
| 207940:KRSamsung Biologics Co Ltd | 4.83% | 0.03% | 4.80% |
| 028260:KRSamsung C&T Corp | 4.58% | 0.04% | 4.54% |
| 016360:KRSamsung Securities Co Ltd | 4.54% | 0.01% | 4.53% |
| 028050:KRSamsung E&A Co Ltd | 4.38% | 0.01% | 4.37% |
| 0126Z0:KRSamsung Episholdings Co L | 3.96% | 0.00% | 3.96% |
| 012750:KRS-1 Corp | 3.55% | 0.00% | 3.55% |
81.8% of SMNG is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMNG or VXUS?
SMNG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SMNG and VXUS?
At least 81.8% of SMNG's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 16 positions we hold weights for in SMNG and 8,462 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMNG or VXUS?
SMNG yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.38%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than SMNG?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.