SMNG vs VYM
xETFs Samsung Group ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SMNG or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMNG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 18 | 610 |
| YTD Return | -6.18% | +15.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.48% |
| Top 10 Weight | 77.6% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | WallStreetX ETFs, Inc. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 22, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SMNG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SMNG vs VYM Performance
xETFs Samsung Group ETF (SMNG) is an ETF from WallStreetX ETFs, Inc. and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SMNG is down 6.18% versus a gain of 15.95% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMNG charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMNG currently yields 0.00% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 16 holdings in SMNG and 602 in VYM, totalling 96.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 60 days apart, SMNG as of Oct 30, 2026 and VYM as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 16 positions we hold weights for in SMNG and 602 in VYM, against full books of 18 and 610.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 576 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SMNG (98.6% of the fund), and 0 for SMNG that do not appear in VYM (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SMNG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMNG or VYM?
SMNG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMNG or VYM?
SMNG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SMNG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.