QQQ vs SRV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
Which is better, QQQ or SRV?
Large Cap Growth against Mid Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y and the full window, SRV over 1Y and 5Y. SRV is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SRV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 4.25% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $295M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 17.27% |
| Holdings | 107 | 66 |
| YTD Return | +15.86% | +28.41%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.63% | +29.46%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.15%Best | +20.47% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.16% | +25.38%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0%Best | 39.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.5% | - |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,390 | $30,984Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 41.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Cushing Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 27, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2007 to Sep 10, 2026 (19 years).
QQQ vs SRV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs SRV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) is an ETF from Cushing Investment Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.63% while SRV returned +29.46%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.86% versus a gain of 28.41% for SRV.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +24.15% per year against +20.47% for SRV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.16% and +25.38% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +15.40% annualized vs -14.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.4% compared with 19.0% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SRV charges 4.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $425 annually, a gap of $407 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 17.27% for SRV.
Holdings Overlap
0.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings SRV also owns. 2.4% of SRV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
SRV and QQQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 58 in SRV, against full books of 107 and 66.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 45 positions for SRV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (84.1% of the fund), and 94 for QQQ that do not appear in SRV (96.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in SRV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEGConstellation Energy Corp | 0.42% | 2.44% | 2.02% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SRV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SRV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SRV charges 4.25%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $407 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SRV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.63% vs +29.46% for SRV, so SRV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), QQQ annualized +15.40% vs -14.82% for SRV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SRV?
SRV has been the more volatile fund at 39.4% annualized versus 19.0% for QQQ.
Should I hold both QQQ and SRV?
QQQ and SRV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SRV?
2.4% of SRV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.4% of SRV's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 58 in SRV.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SRV?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SRV yields 17.27%, so SRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SRV better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y and the full window, SRV over 1Y and 5Y. SRV is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.