QQQ vs SRV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SRV delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SRV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 4.25% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $295M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 15.33% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 57 | |
| YTD Return | +18.31% | +27.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.37% | +29.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.79% | +20.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.20% | +26.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 39.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -99.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Cushing Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 27, 2007 |
QQQ vs SRV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) is a ETF from Cushing Investment Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.37% while SRV returned +29.31%. Year to date, QQQ is up 18.31% versus a gain of 27.13% for SRV.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.79% per year against +20.93% for SRV; over five years the annualized figures are +15.20% and +26.44% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs -14.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.5% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -99.6% for SRV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SRV charges 4.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $425 annually, a gap of $407 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 15.33% for SRV.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SRV share 1 holdings out of 148 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in SRV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEG | 0.41% | 1.73% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SRV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SRV charges 4.25%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $407 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SRV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.37% vs +29.31% for SRV, so SRV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), QQQ annualized +13.10% vs -14.93% for SRV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SRV?
SRV has been the more volatile fund at 39.5% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SRV -99.6%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SRV?
QQQ and SRV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SRV?
QQQ and SRV share 1 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 148 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SRV?
QQQ yields 0.41% while SRV yields 15.33%, so SRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.