SRV vs VYM
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SRV or VYM?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SRV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 4.25% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $295M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 17.27% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 66 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +21.57%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +18.48%Best | +15.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.14%Best | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.31%Best | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.4% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -58.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $28,510Best | $17,861 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Cushing Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2007 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2007 to Sep 18, 2026 (19.1 years).
SRV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.1 years both funds cover.
SRV vs VYM Performance
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) is an ETF from Cushing Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRV returned +18.48% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, SRV is up 21.57% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, SRV compounded at +19.14% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +23.31% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.82% annualized vs -15.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.4% compared with 14.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRV charges 4.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $425 vs $4 annually, a gap of $421 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRV currently yields 17.27% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
23.5% of SRV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.1% of VYM's money is in holdings SRV also owns.
SRV and VYM share little of their money.
12 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in SRV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 66 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 516 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SRV (94.0% of the fund), and 37 for SRV that do not appear in VYM (63.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SRV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 5.10% | 0.35% | 4.75% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 4.85% | 0.23% | 4.62% |
| DTMDT Midstream Inc | 3.83% | 0.06% | 3.77% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.98% | 0.23% | 2.75% |
| NRGNrg Energy | 2.84% | 0.11% | 2.73% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.38% | 0.25% | 2.13% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 0.30% | 0.74% | 0.44% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 0.58% | 0.25% | 0.33% |
| EQTEQT Corp. | 0.61% | 0.13% | 0.48% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.00% | 0.38% | 0.38% |
23.5% of SRV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRV or VYM?
SRV has an expense ratio of 4.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $421 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SRV or VYM?
Over the past year SRV returned +18.48% vs +15.34% for VYM, so SRV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), SRV annualized -15.05% vs +6.82% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SRV or VYM?
SRV has been the more volatile fund at 39.4% annualized versus 14.7% for VYM.
Should I hold both SRV and VYM?
SRV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SRV and VYM?
23.5% of SRV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.1% of VYM's is in holdings SRV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in SRV and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRV or VYM?
SRV yields 17.27% while VYM yields 2.22%, so SRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SRV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SRV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.