SRV vs VYM
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SRV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 4.25% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $295M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.33% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +23.80% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.05% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.35% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.59% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Cushing Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2007 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SRV vs VYM Performance
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) is a ETF from Cushing Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRV returned +27.05% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, SRV is up 23.80% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, SRV compounded at +19.35% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +26.59% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs -15.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.6% for SRV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRV charges 4.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $425 vs $4 annually, a gap of $421 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRV currently yields 15.33% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SRV and VYM share 12 holdings out of 592 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRV or VYM?
SRV has an expense ratio of 4.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $421 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRV or VYM?
Over the past year SRV returned +27.05% vs +26.12% for VYM, so SRV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), SRV annualized -15.05% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRV or VYM?
SRV has been the more volatile fund at 39.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SRV -99.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SRV and VYM?
SRV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRV and VYM?
SRV and VYM share 12 common holdings with a 3.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 592 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRV or VYM?
SRV yields 15.33% while VYM yields 2.86%, so SRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.