IVV vs SRV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
Which is better, IVV or SRV?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, SRV over 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SRV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 4.25% |
| AUM | $879.1B | $258M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 18.63% |
| Holdings | 509 | 52 |
| YTD Return | +11.33%Best | -0.11% |
| 1Y Return | +13.50%Best | +0.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.45%Best | +15.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.61% | +14.74%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 39.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | - |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,319 | $19,887Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Cushing Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 27, 2007 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2007 to Nov 13, 2026 (19.2 years).
IVV vs SRV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SRV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) is an ETF from Cushing Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +13.50% while SRV returned +0.09%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.33% versus a loss of 0.11% for SRV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.45% per year against +15.51% for SRV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.61% and +14.74% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.36% annualized vs -15.81%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.4% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SRV charges 4.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $425 annually, a gap of $422 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 18.63% for SRV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.6% of IVV's money is in holdings SRV also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for SRV, our book for it lists positions totalling 149.9% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
IVV and SRV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 64 days apart, IVV as of Nov 3, 2026 and SRV as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
12 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 52 in SRV, against full books of 509 and 52.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SRV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRGPTarga Resources Inc | 0.10% | 7.89% | 7.79% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.14% | 6.38% | 6.24% |
| GEVGe Vernova | 0.35% | 4.86% | 4.51% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 0.09% | 4.51% | 4.42% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corp | 0.13% | 4.35% | 4.22% |
| BEBloom Energy Corporation Com Cl A | 0.09% | 4.07% | 3.98% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 0.07% | 4.03% | 3.96% |
| NRGNrg Energy Inc. | 0.03% | 3.97% | 3.94% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 0.10% | 3.18% | 3.08% |
| PWRQuanta | 0.14% | 2.75% | 2.61% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SRV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SRV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SRV charges 4.25%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $422 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SRV?
Over the past year IVV returned +13.50% vs +0.09% for SRV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IVV annualized +9.36% vs -15.81% for SRV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SRV?
SRV has been the more volatile fund at 39.4% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV.
Should I hold both IVV and SRV?
IVV and SRV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SRV?
At least 1.6% of IVV's money is in holdings SRV also owns. Our book for SRV is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 52 in SRV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SRV?
IVV yields 1.09% while SRV yields 18.63%, so SRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SRV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, SRV over 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.