IVV vs SRV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
Which is better, IVV or SRV?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, SRV over 1Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SRV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 4.25% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $295M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 17.27% |
| Holdings | 508 | 66 |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +21.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | +18.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38%Best | +19.14% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | +23.31%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 39.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | - |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,844 | $28,510Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 41.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Cushing Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 27, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2007 to Sep 18, 2026 (19.1 years).
IVV vs SRV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SRV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) is an ETF from Cushing Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while SRV returned +18.48%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 21.57% for SRV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +19.14% for SRV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.51% and +23.31% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.49% annualized vs -15.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.4% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SRV charges 4.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $425 annually, a gap of $422 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 17.27% for SRV.
Holdings Overlap
1.8% of IVV's money is in holdings SRV also owns. 25.9% of SRV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
SRV and IVV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, IVV as of Aug 31, 2026 and SRV as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 58 in SRV, against full books of 508 and 66.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 35 positions for SRV that do not appear in our book for IVV (60.6% of the fund), and 469 for IVV that do not appear in SRV (96.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SRV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.14% | 5.10% | 4.96% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 0.10% | 4.85% | 4.75% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 0.09% | 2.98% | 2.89% |
| NRGNrg Energy | 0.04% | 2.84% | 2.80% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.13% | 2.44% | 2.31% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 0.10% | 2.38% | 2.28% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 0.14% | 2.19% | 2.05% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.36% | 1.61% | 1.25% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 0.09% | 0.58% | 0.49% |
| EQTEQT Corp. | 0.05% | 0.61% | 0.56% |
25.9% of SRV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SRV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SRV charges 4.25%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $422 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SRV?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +18.48% for SRV, so SRV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IVV annualized +9.49% vs -15.05% for SRV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SRV?
SRV has been the more volatile fund at 39.4% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV.
Should I hold both IVV and SRV?
IVV and SRV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SRV?
25.9% of SRV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 25.9% of SRV's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 58 in SRV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SRV?
IVV yields 1.06% while SRV yields 17.27%, so SRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SRV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, SRV over 1Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.