SRV vs VXUS
SRV vs VXUS
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 4.25% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $295M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.33% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +23.80% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.05% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.35% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.59% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Cushing Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2007 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SRV vs VXUS Performance
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) is a ETF from Cushing Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRV returned +27.05% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, SRV is up 23.80% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, SRV compounded at +19.35% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +26.59% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -15.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.6% for SRV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRV charges 4.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $425 vs $5 annually, a gap of $420 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRV currently yields 15.33% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SRV and VXUS share 3 holdings out of 7904 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRV or VXUS?
SRV has an expense ratio of 4.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $420 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRV or VXUS?
Over the past year SRV returned +27.05% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SRV annualized -15.05% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRV or VXUS?
SRV has been the more volatile fund at 39.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SRV -99.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SRV and VXUS?
SRV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRV and VXUS?
SRV and VXUS share 3 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7904 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRV or VXUS?
SRV yields 15.33% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so SRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.