QQQ vs SRVR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SRVR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $376M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 2.74% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 71 | |
| YTD Return | +17.46% | +10.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.02% | +3.60% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.51% | +5.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.12% | -2.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 18.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -41.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 15, 2018 |
QQQ vs SRVR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.02% while SRVR returned +3.60%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.46% versus a gain of 10.25% for SRVR.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.51% per year against +5.80% for SRVR; over five years the annualized figures are +15.12% and -2.67% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.9% for SRVR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -41.0% for SRVR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SRVR charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $49 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 2.74% for SRVR.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SRVR share 1 holdings out of 168 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in SRVR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEG | 0.41% | 0.06% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SRVR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SRVR charges 0.49%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SRVR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.02% vs +3.60% for SRVR, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QQQ annualized +13.08% vs +4.64% for SRVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SRVR?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.9% for SRVR. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SRVR -41.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SRVR?
QQQ and SRVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SRVR?
QQQ and SRVR share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 168 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SRVR?
QQQ yields 0.41% while SRVR yields 2.74%, so SRVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.