QQQ vs THOR

QQQ vs THOR

Which is better, QQQ or THOR?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQTHOR
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.79%
AUM$483.5B$24M
Dividend Yield0.44%0.00%
Holdings10755
YTD Return+15.21%Best+4.56%
1Y Return+19.78%-
3Y Return (annualized)+24.58%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.93%-
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Thornburg Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 10, 1999Jun 22, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

QQQ vs THOR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs THOR Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF (THOR) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.21% versus a gain of 4.56% for THOR.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while THOR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $79 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for THOR.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in THOR5.3%

At least 5.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings THOR also owns.

Stated as a floor: for THOR, our book for it covers 94.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

QQQ and THOR share little of their money.

2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 53 in THOR, against full books of 107 and 55.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in THORDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.16%2.35%0.81%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares2.10%0.79%1.31%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and THOR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQTHOR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or THOR?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while THOR charges 0.79%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and THOR?

At least 5.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings THOR also owns. Our book for THOR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 53 in THOR.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or THOR?

QQQ yields 0.44% while THOR yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is THOR better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.