QQQ vs THOR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF
Which is better, QQQ or THOR?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. THOR is less concentrated, with 30.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | THOR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $498.6B | $35M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 59 |
| YTD Return | +21.69%Best | +0.73% |
| 1Y Return | +24.10% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.05% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.31% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.2% | 30.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 22, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs THOR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs THOR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF (THOR) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.69% versus a gain of 0.73% for THOR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while THOR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $79 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for THOR.
Holdings Overlap
4.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings THOR also owns. 3.9% of THOR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
QQQ and THOR share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 54 in THOR, against full books of 321 and 59.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for THOR that do not appear in our book for QQQ (26.3% of the fund), and 94 for QQQ that do not appear in THOR (93.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and THOR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or THOR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while THOR charges 0.79%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and THOR?
4.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings THOR also owns. 3.9% of THOR's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 54 in THOR.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or THOR?
QQQ yields 0.42% while THOR yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THOR better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. THOR is less concentrated, with 30.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.