SCHD vs THOR
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF
Which is better, SCHD or THOR?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. THOR is less concentrated, with 30.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | THOR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $108.9B | $35M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 206 | 59 |
| YTD Return | +23.29%Best | +0.73% |
| 1Y Return | +29.70% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.26% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.65% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 30.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jun 22, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SCHD vs THOR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs THOR Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF (THOR) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, SCHD is up 23.29% versus a gain of 0.73% for THOR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while THOR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $79 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.00% for THOR.
Holdings Overlap
10.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings THOR also owns. 8.6% of THOR's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
SCHD and THOR share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 54 in THOR, against full books of 206 and 59.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 11 positions for THOR that do not appear in our book for SCHD (21.5% of the fund), and 94 for SCHD that do not appear in THOR (89.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and THOR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or THOR?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while THOR charges 0.79%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and THOR?
10.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings THOR also owns. 8.6% of THOR's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 54 in THOR.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or THOR?
SCHD yields 3.00% while THOR yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THOR better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. THOR is less concentrated, with 30.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.