IVV vs THOR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF
Which is better, IVV or THOR?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | THOR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $24M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 55 |
| YTD Return | +11.03%Best | +4.56% |
| 1Y Return | +15.62% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 22, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs THOR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs THOR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF (THOR) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 4.56% for THOR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while THOR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for THOR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 6.1% of IVV's money is in holdings THOR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for THOR, our book for it covers 94.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and THOR share little of their money.
11 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 53 in THOR, against full books of 508 and 55.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in THOR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 2.35% | 0.30% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 0.05% | 3.94% | 3.89% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 0.27% | 3.18% | 2.91% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.55% | 2.13% | 1.58% |
| CMECme Group, Cl A | 0.16% | 2.46% | 2.30% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.68% | 1.84% | 1.16% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.18% | 1.97% | 1.79% |
| RFRegions Financial Corp. | 0.04% | 1.96% | 1.92% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.66% | 0.79% | 0.13% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.49% | 0.95% | 0.46% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and THOR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or THOR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while THOR charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and THOR?
At least 6.1% of IVV's money is in holdings THOR also owns. Our book for THOR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 53 in THOR.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or THOR?
IVV yields 1.06% while THOR yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THOR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.