QQQ vs TILL

QQQ vs TILL

Which is better, QQQ or TILL?

Large Cap Growth against Agriculture.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQTILL
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.89%
AUM$483.5B$44M
Dividend Yield0.44%4.00%
Holdings1076
YTD Return+17.95%+22.50%Best
1Y Return+21.77%Best+18.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+25.63%Best-2.01%
5Y Return (annualized)+15.24%-
Volatility (annualized)20.0%13.1%Best
Max Drawdown-22.8%Best-33.8%
$10,000 over 4.3 years$24,000Best$8,178
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Teucrium
CategoryEquityCommodity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthAgriculture
InceptionMar 10, 1999May 16, 2022

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 17, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.3 years).

QQQ vs TILL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.

QQQ vs TILL Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is an ETF from Teucrium. Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% while TILL returned +18.71%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 22.50% for TILL.

Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.63% per year against -2.01% for TILL. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +22.58% annualized vs -4.57%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 13.1% for TILL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -33.8% for TILL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TILL charges 0.89%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $89 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 4.00% for TILL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and TILL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQTILL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or TILL?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TILL charges 0.89%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or TILL?

Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% vs +18.71% for TILL, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +22.58% vs -4.57% for TILL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or TILL?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 13.1% for TILL. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs TILL -33.8%.

Should I hold both QQQ and TILL?

QQQ and TILL have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TILL?

QQQ yields 0.44% while TILL yields 4.00%, so TILL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TILL better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.