TILL vs VYM

TILL vs VYM

Which is better, TILL or VYM?

Agriculture against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. TILL led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTILLVYM
Expense Ratio0.89%0.04%Best
AUM$44M$81.6B
Dividend Yield4.00%2.22%
Holdings6613
YTD Return+22.81%Best+9.71%
1Y Return+19.78%Best+13.77%
3Y Return (annualized)-1.78%+17.30%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.45%
Volatility (annualized)13.0%Best14.1%
Max Drawdown-33.8%-14.5%Best
$10,000 over 4.4 years$8,166$16,189Best
Fund FamilyTeucriumVanguard (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
StyleAgricultureLarge Cap Value
InceptionMay 16, 2022Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 17, 2022 to Sep 24, 2026 (4.4 years).

TILL vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.

TILL vs VYM Performance

Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is an ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TILL returned +19.78% while VYM returned +13.77%. Year to date, TILL is up 22.81% versus a gain of 9.71% for VYM.

Over three years, TILL compounded at -1.78% per year against +17.30% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +11.57% annualized vs -4.50%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.0% for TILL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.8% for TILL and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TILL charges 0.89% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $4 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TILL currently yields 4.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of TILL and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

TILLVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TILL or VYM?

TILL has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $85 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, TILL or VYM?

Over the past year TILL returned +19.78% vs +13.77% for VYM, so TILL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TILL annualized -4.50% vs +11.57% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, TILL or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.0% for TILL. Worst drawdown: TILL -33.8% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both TILL and VYM?

TILL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, TILL or VYM?

TILL yields 4.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so TILL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than TILL?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. TILL led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.