IVV vs TILL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.89% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $34M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 4.58% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +13.22% | +18.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | +15.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.17% | -2.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -33.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Teucrium | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 16, 2022 |
IVV vs TILL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is a ETF from Teucrium. Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% while TILL returned +15.15%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.22% versus a gain of 18.64% for TILL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.17% per year against -2.41% for TILL. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs -5.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.7% for TILL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -33.8% for TILL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TILL charges 0.89%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $89 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 4.58% for TILL.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TILL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TILL charges 0.89%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TILL?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% vs +15.15% for TILL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs -5.37% for TILL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TILL?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.7% for TILL. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TILL -33.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and TILL?
IVV and TILL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TILL?
IVV yields 1.10% while TILL yields 4.58%, so TILL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.