QQQ vs TOS
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF
Which is better, QQQ or TOS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TOS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.36% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $153M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 107 | 28 |
| YTD Return | +15.21% | +15.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.78% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.58% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.93% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5%Best | 76.1% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Twin Oak |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 27, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs TOS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs TOS Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) is an ETF from Twin Oak. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.21% versus a gain of 15.68% for TOS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TOS charges 0.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $36 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for TOS.
Holdings Overlap
22.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings TOS also owns. 37.6% of TOS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 20 in TOS, against full books of 107 and 28.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for TOS that do not appear in our book for QQQ (43.4% of the fund), and 89 for QQQ that do not appear in TOS (76.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in TOS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 9.97% | 1.53% |
| ASL:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares | 0.68% | 10.03% | 9.35% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 5.11% | 0.44% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 1.69% | 4.48% | 2.79% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.42% | 5.38% | 4.96% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 0.97% | 3.46% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.88% | 1.10% | 0.22% |
| STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc | 0.83% | 0.57% | 0.26% |
37.6% of TOS is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TOS?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TOS charges 0.36%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TOS?
37.6% of TOS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 37.6% of TOS's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 20 in TOS.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TOS?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TOS yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TOS better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.