QQQ vs TURF
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. TURF delivered stronger 1-year returns. TURF offers more diversification with 347 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TURF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.44% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $318M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.33% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 347 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +23.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +42.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 19.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -13.2% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | T.Rowe Price | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 11, 2025 |
QQQ vs TURF Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while TURF returned +42.44%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 23.29% for TURF.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.8% for TURF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -13.2% for TURF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TURF charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $44 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.33% for TURF.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TURF share 1 holdings out of 184 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in TURF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FANG | 0.23% | 0.76% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TURF?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TURF charges 0.44%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TURF?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +42.44% for TURF, so TURF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +37.73% for TURF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TURF?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.8% for TURF. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TURF -13.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TURF?
QQQ and TURF have a monthly-return correlation of -0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TURF?
QQQ and TURF share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 184 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TURF?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TURF yields 1.33%, so TURF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.