IVV vs TURF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
Which is better, IVV or TURF?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TURF led over 1Y and the full window. TURF is less concentrated, with 36.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TURF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.44% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $330M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.21% |
| Holdings | 508 | 95 |
| YTD Return | +11.03% | +18.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.62% | +30.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2%Best | 19.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -13.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $12,774 | $14,238Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 36.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 11, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 12, 2025 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.3 years).
IVV vs TURF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TURF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while TURF returned +30.07%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 18.67% for TURF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TURF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 12.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -13.2% for TURF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TURF charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $44 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.21% for TURF.
Holdings Overlap
2.4% of IVV's money is in holdings TURF also owns. 29.2% of TURF's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
TURF and IVV share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 84 in TURF, against full books of 508 and 95.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 16 positions for TURF that do not appear in our book for IVV (7.4% of the fund), and 469 for IVV that do not appear in TURF (96.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TURF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 0.09% | 5.51% | 5.42% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.01% | 4.07% | 3.06% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.58% | 3.02% | 2.44% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 0.06% | 3.28% | 3.22% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 0.16% | 2.76% | 2.60% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.24% | 2.10% | 1.86% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 0.02% | 2.11% | 2.09% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 0.02% | 1.64% | 1.62% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 0.03% | 1.61% | 1.58% |
| MOSMosaic Co | 0.01% | 1.39% | 1.38% |
29.2% of TURF is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TURF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TURF charges 0.44%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TURF?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +30.07% for TURF, so TURF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +20.72% vs +31.23% for TURF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TURF?
TURF has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 12.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs TURF -13.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and TURF?
IVV and TURF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TURF?
29.2% of TURF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 29.2% of TURF's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 84 in TURF.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TURF?
IVV yields 1.06% while TURF yields 1.21%, so TURF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TURF better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TURF led over 1Y and the full window. TURF is less concentrated, with 36.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.