QQQ vs VVR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Invesco Senior Income Trust
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VVR offers more diversification with 525 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | VVR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 5.26% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $1,117.8 | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 12.77% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 525 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | -1.98% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | -7.91% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +3.33% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +4.19% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 14.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -81.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 24, 1998 |
QQQ vs VVR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while VVR returned -7.91%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a loss of 1.98% for VVR.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +3.33% for VVR; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +4.19% respectively. Across the full 27-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs -2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.9% for VVR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -81.8% for VVR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while VVR charges 5.26%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $526 annually, a gap of $508 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 12.77% for VVR.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and VVR share 0 holdings out of 240 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or VVR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VVR charges 5.26%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $508 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or VVR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs -7.91% for VVR, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (27 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs -2.14% for VVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or VVR?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.9% for VVR. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs VVR -81.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and VVR?
QQQ and VVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and VVR?
QQQ and VVR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 240 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or VVR?
QQQ yields 0.44% while VVR yields 12.77%, so VVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.