QQQ vs WEED
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Roundhill Cannabis ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WEED | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.41% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 9 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | +3.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +3.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | +1.37% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 80.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -88.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 20, 2022 |
QQQ vs WEED Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while WEED returned +3.55%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a gain of 3.44% for WEED.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.75% per year against +1.37% for WEED. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs -25.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WEED has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 80.2% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -88.1% for WEED. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WEED charges 0.41%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $41 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for WEED.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and WEED share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WEED?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WEED charges 0.41%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or WEED?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +3.55% for WEED, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs -25.47% for WEED. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WEED?
WEED has been the more volatile fund at 80.2% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WEED -88.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WEED?
QQQ and WEED have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WEED?
QQQ and WEED share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WEED?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WEED yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.