QQQ vs WINC
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Western Asset Short Duration Income ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. WINC offers more diversification with 128 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WINC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.29% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $12M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 4.42% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 128 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +3.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +4.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +4.92% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +2.48% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 16.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -32.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Feb 7, 2019 |
QQQ vs WINC Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Western Asset Short Duration Income ETF (WINC) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while WINC returned +4.87%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 3.43% for WINC.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +4.92% for WINC; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +2.48% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.1% for WINC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -32.0% for WINC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WINC charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $29 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 4.42% for WINC.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WINC?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WINC charges 0.29%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or WINC?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +4.87% for WINC, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +3.18% for WINC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WINC?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.1% for WINC. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WINC -32.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WINC?
QQQ and WINC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WINC?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WINC yields 4.42%, so WINC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.