QQQ vs YOLO
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs ADVISORSHARES PURE CANNABIS ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | YOLO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.51% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $34M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 20 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | -9.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | -7.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +7.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | -28.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 53.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -94.7% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Advisor Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 17, 2019 |
QQQ vs YOLO Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and ADVISORSHARES PURE CANNABIS ETF (YOLO) is a ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while YOLO returned -7.55%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a loss of 9.47% for YOLO.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +7.19% for YOLO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and -28.33% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs -23.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
YOLO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.7% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -94.7% for YOLO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while YOLO charges 0.51%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $51 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for YOLO.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and YOLO share 0 holdings out of 121 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or YOLO?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while YOLO charges 0.51%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or YOLO?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs -7.55% for YOLO, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs -23.13% for YOLO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or YOLO?
YOLO has been the more volatile fund at 53.7% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs YOLO -94.7%.
Should I hold both QQQ and YOLO?
QQQ and YOLO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and YOLO?
QQQ and YOLO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 121 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or YOLO?
QQQ yields 0.44% while YOLO yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.