QQQS vs VYM
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QQQS or VYM?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQQS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. QQQS is less concentrated, with 8.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.65% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 205 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +29.17%Best | +14.33% |
| 1Y Return | +44.67%Best | +20.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.79%Best | +18.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.7% | 11.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.1% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $18,392Best | $18,386 |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.4%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2022 to Sep 8, 2026 (3.9 years).
QQQS vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
QQQS vs VYM Performance
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQS returned +44.67% while VYM returned +20.01%. Year to date, QQQS is up 29.17% versus a gain of 14.33% for VYM.
Over three years, QQQS compounded at +22.79% per year against +18.43% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQS has the edge at +16.91% annualized vs +16.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.7% compared with 11.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.1% for QQQS and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQS charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQS currently yields 2.65% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
4.6% of QQQS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.2% of VYM's money is in holdings QQQS also owns.
QQQS and VYM share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in QQQS and 602 in VYM, against full books of 205 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 561 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QQQS (97.1% of the fund), and 178 for QQQS that do not appear in VYM (87.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQS | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NWLNewell Brands Inc. | 0.90% | 0.01% | 0.89% |
| MLKNHerman Miller Inc | 0.75% | 0.01% | 0.74% |
| AOSAnika Therapeutics Inc | 0.67% | 0.03% | 0.64% |
| IOSPInnospec Inc.(iosp) | 0.52% | 0.01% | 0.51% |
| GNTXGentex Corp | 0.50% | 0.02% | 0.48% |
| OLEDUniversal Display Corporation | 0.47% | 0.02% | 0.45% |
| SWKSSkyworks Solutions Inccommon Stock | 0.43% | 0.04% | 0.39% |
| POWIPower Integrations Inc | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.36% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQS and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQS or VYM?
QQQS has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQS or VYM?
Over the past year QQQS returned +44.67% vs +20.01% for VYM, so QQQS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQS annualized +16.91% vs +16.90% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQS or VYM?
QQQS has been the more volatile fund at 26.7% annualized versus 11.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QQQS -38.1% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both QQQS and VYM?
QQQS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQS and VYM?
4.6% of QQQS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.2% of VYM's is in holdings QQQS also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in QQQS and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQS or VYM?
QQQS yields 2.65% while VYM yields 2.24%, so QQQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QQQS?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQQS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. QQQS is less concentrated, with 8.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.