IVV vs QQQS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
Which is better, IVV or QQQS?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, QQQS over 1Y and 3Y. QQQS is less concentrated, with 8.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQQS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.20% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $22M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.54% |
| Holdings | 508 | 205 |
| YTD Return | +12.24% | +27.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.61% | +41.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98% | +22.12%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0%Best | 26.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -38.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $21,926Best | $18,099 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 8.4%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 13, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2022 to Sep 9, 2026 (3.9 years).
IVV vs QQQS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QQQS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while QQQS returned +41.98%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 27.13% for QQQS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +22.12% for QQQS. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +22.30% annualized vs +16.43%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.7% compared with 13.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -38.1% for QQQS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQQS charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.54% for QQQS.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings QQQS also owns. 1.6% of QQQS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
QQQS and IVV share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 203 in QQQS, against full books of 508 and 205.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 185 positions for QQQS that do not appear in our book for IVV (91.1% of the fund), and 493 for IVV that do not appear in QQQS (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and QQQS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQQS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQS charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QQQS?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs +41.98% for QQQS, so QQQS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +22.30% vs +16.43% for QQQS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQQS?
QQQS has been the more volatile fund at 26.7% annualized versus 13.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs QQQS -38.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQQS?
IVV and QQQS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQQS?
1.6% of QQQS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.6% of QQQS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 203 in QQQS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQQS?
IVV yields 1.06% while QQQS yields 2.54%, so QQQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, QQQS over 1Y and 3Y. QQQS is less concentrated, with 8.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.