IVV vs QQQS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQQS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQQS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.20% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $23M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.65% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 205 | |
| YTD Return | +13.22% | +32.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | +61.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.17% | +22.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 27.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -38.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 13, 2022 |
IVV vs QQQS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% while QQQS returned +61.62%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.22% versus a gain of 32.70% for QQQS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.17% per year against +22.60% for QQQS. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQS has the edge at +18.00% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -38.1% for QQQS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQQS charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.65% for QQQS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQQS share 4 holdings out of 703 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQQS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQS charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQQS?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% vs +61.62% for QQQS, so QQQS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +18.00% for QQQS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQQS?
QQQS has been the more volatile fund at 27.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQQS -38.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQQS?
IVV and QQQS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQQS?
IVV and QQQS share 4 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 703 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQQS?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQQS yields 2.65%, so QQQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.