QQQS vs VTI
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QQQS or VTI?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQS led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over the full window. QQQS is less concentrated, with 10.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.54% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 413 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +25.41%Best | +13.35% |
| 1Y Return | +28.77%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.77%Best | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.5% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.1% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $17,951 | $21,850Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 10.9%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2022 to Oct 2, 2026 (4 years).
QQQS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
QQQS vs VTI Performance
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQS returned +28.77% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, QQQS is up 25.41% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, QQQS compounded at +25.77% per year against +23.41% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +21.58% annualized vs +15.75%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.5% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.1% for QQQS and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQS charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQS currently yields 2.54% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
84.1% of QQQS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings QQQS also owns.
Most of QQQS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, QQQS as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
166 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in QQQS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 413 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,129 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QQQS (97.2% of the fund), and 23 for QQQS that do not appear in VTI (8.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXG10x Genomics Inc Com Usd 1 Cl A | 1.24% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
| QMCOQuantum Corp_None_0 | 1.24% | 0.00% | 1.24% |
| IOVAIovance Biotherapeutics Inc | 1.07% | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| XNCRXencor Inc | 1.05% | 0.00% | 1.05% |
| AGENAgenus Inc | 1.01% | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| ATRCAtricure, Inc. | 1.01% | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| STIMNeuronetics Inc | 1.01% | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| VREXVarex Imaging Corp | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.92% |
| NWLNewell Brands Inc. | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.89% |
| OMEROmeros Corp Com | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.85% |
84.1% of QQQS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQS or VTI?
QQQS has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQS or VTI?
Over the past year QQQS returned +28.77% vs +15.92% for VTI, so QQQS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQS annualized +15.75% vs +21.58% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQS or VTI?
QQQS has been the more volatile fund at 26.5% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQQS -38.1% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both QQQS and VTI?
QQQS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQS and VTI?
84.1% of QQQS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings QQQS also owns. They hold 166 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in QQQS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQS or VTI?
QQQS yields 2.54% while VTI yields 1.03%, so QQQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QQQS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQS led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over the full window. QQQS is less concentrated, with 10.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.