QQQT vs VTI
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QQQT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.20% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $50M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 20.93% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.57% | +12.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.50% | +20.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
QQQT vs VTI Performance
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQT returned +20.50% while VTI returned +20.47%. Year to date, QQQT is up 14.57% versus a gain of 12.79% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for QQQT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQT charges 1.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $120 vs $3 annually, a gap of $117 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQT currently yields 20.93% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QQQT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQT or VTI?
QQQT has an expense ratio of 1.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $117 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQT or VTI?
Over the past year QQQT returned +20.50% vs +20.47% for VTI, so QQQT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQT annualized +17.24% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQT or VTI?
QQQT has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQQT -22.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QQQT and VTI?
QQQT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQT and VTI?
QQQT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQT or VTI?
QQQT yields 20.93% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QQQT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.