QQWZ vs VXUS
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQWZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $38M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.55% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 105 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +13.92% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.05% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 6, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QQWZ vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQWZ returned +23.05% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, QQWZ is up 13.92% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 15.0% for QQWZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.3% for QQWZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQWZ charges 0.49% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $5 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQWZ currently yields 0.55% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QQWZ and VXUS share 3 holdings out of 7874 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQWZ or VXUS?
QQWZ has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQWZ or VXUS?
Over the past year QQWZ returned +23.05% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQWZ annualized +34.72% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQWZ or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 15.0% for QQWZ. Worst drawdown: QQWZ -11.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QQWZ and VXUS?
QQWZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQWZ and VXUS?
QQWZ and VXUS share 3 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7874 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQWZ or VXUS?
QQWZ yields 0.55% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.