QQWZ vs VOO
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QQWZ or VOO?
QQWZ has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QQWZ led over 1Y and the full window. QQWZ is less concentrated, with 21.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQWZ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $43M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 104 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +14.09%Best | +12.50% |
| 1Y Return | +20.65%Best | +17.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.3% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $14,396Best | $13,666 |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.4%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 6, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 7, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.3 years).
QQWZ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
QQWZ vs VOO Performance
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQWZ returned +20.65% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, QQWZ is up 14.09% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 12.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.3% for QQWZ and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQWZ charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQWZ currently yields 0.59% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
94.2% of QQWZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.3% of VOO's money is in holdings QQWZ also owns.
Most of QQWZ is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, QQWZ as of Sep 1, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
90 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in QQWZ and 505 in VOO, against full books of 104 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 406 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QQWZ (92.2% of the fund), and 10 for QQWZ that do not appear in VOO (4.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQWZ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRMSalesforce Inc. | 2.46% | 0.20% | 2.26% |
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 2.25% | 0.15% | 2.10% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp. | 2.26% | 0.12% | 2.14% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 2.13% | 0.21% | 1.92% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 2.15% | 0.11% | 2.04% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.07% | 0.18% | 1.89% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 2.01% | 0.24% | 1.77% |
| TAt&t, Inc. | 2.02% | 0.22% | 1.80% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 1.96% | 0.27% | 1.69% |
| ADBEAdobe Inc | 2.07% | 0.13% | 1.94% |
94.2% of QQWZ is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQWZ or VOO?
QQWZ has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQWZ or VOO?
Over the past year QQWZ returned +20.65% vs +17.58% for VOO, so QQWZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQWZ annualized +32.35% vs +27.16% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQWZ or VOO?
QQWZ has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 12.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQWZ -11.3% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both QQWZ and VOO?
QQWZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQWZ and VOO?
94.2% of QQWZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 7.3% of VOO's is in holdings QQWZ also owns. They hold 90 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in QQWZ and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQWZ or VOO?
QQWZ yields 0.59% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QQWZ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QQWZ led over 1Y and the full window. QQWZ is less concentrated, with 21.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.