QQWZ vs VOO
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QQWZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQWZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $41M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 105 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.86% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.25% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 6, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QQWZ vs VOO Performance
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQWZ returned +28.25% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, QQWZ is up 16.86% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.3% for QQWZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQWZ charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQWZ currently yields 0.59% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QQWZ and VOO share 88 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 54.5% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQWZ or VOO?
QQWZ has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQWZ or VOO?
Over the past year QQWZ returned +28.25% vs +21.87% for VOO, so QQWZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQWZ annualized +36.54% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQWZ or VOO?
QQWZ has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQWZ -11.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QQWZ and VOO?
QQWZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQWZ and VOO?
QQWZ and VOO share 88 common holdings with a 54.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQWZ or VOO?
QQWZ yields 0.59% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.