REGL vs VOO
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, REGL or VOO?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. REGL is less concentrated, with 17.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REGL | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.7B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.19% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 66 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +3.75% | +12.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.67% | +16.35%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.42% | +22.92%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.22% | +13.55%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0%Tie | 15.0%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -36.4% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,170 | $18,877Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.3%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 5, 2015 to Sep 28, 2026 (11.6 years).
REGL vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.6 years both funds cover.
REGL vs VOO Performance
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year REGL returned +3.67% while VOO returned +16.35%. Year to date, REGL is up 3.75% versus a gain of 12.67% for VOO.
Over three years, REGL compounded at +11.42% per year against +22.92% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.22% and +13.55% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +12.70% annualized vs +9.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REGL and VOO have been equally volatile, both at 15.0% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.4% for REGL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REGL charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REGL currently yields 2.19% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 65 holdings in REGL and 494 in VOO, totalling 99.9% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in REGL and 494 in VOO, against full books of 66 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for REGL (99.2% of the fund), and 64 for REGL that do not appear in VOO (98.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of REGL and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REGL or VOO?
REGL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, REGL or VOO?
Over the past year REGL returned +3.67% vs +16.35% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), REGL annualized +9.11% vs +12.70% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, REGL or VOO?
REGL and VOO have been equally volatile, both at 15.0% annualized. Worst drawdown: REGL -36.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both REGL and VOO?
REGL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, REGL or VOO?
REGL yields 2.19% while VOO yields 1.04%, so REGL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than REGL?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. REGL is less concentrated, with 17.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.